Time limits for unfair dismissal and general protections cases

Applications to have the Fair Work Commission deal with an unfair dismissal claim must be made within 21 days of the l The Fair Work Act provides that the Commission may extend that time where there are “exceptional circumstances”, which is a high bar. This is how high it is.

“The correct approach to be taken was explained by the Full Bench in Stogiannidis v

Victorian Frozen Foods Distributors Pty Ltd t/as Richmond Oysters:9

“[38] As we have mentioned, the assessment of whether exceptional circumstances exist

requires a consideration of all the relevant circumstances. No one factor (such as the

reason for the delay) need be found to be exceptional in order to enliven the discretion

to extend time. This is so because even though no one factor may be exceptional, in

combination with other factors the circumstances may be such as to be regarded as

exceptional.

[39] So much is clear from the structure of s.366(2), each of the matters needs to be

taken into account in assessing whether there are exceptional circumstances. The

individual matters might not, viewed in isolation, be particularly significant, so it is

necessary to consider the matters collectively and to ask whether collectively the matters

disclose exceptional circumstances. The absence of any explanation for any part of the

delay, will usually weigh against an applicant in such an assessment. Similarly a credible

explanation for the entirety of the delay, will usually weigh in the applicant’s favour,

though, as we mention later, it is a question of degree and insight. However the ultimate

conclusion as to the existence of exceptional circumstances will turn on a consideration

of all of the relevant matters and the assignment of appropriate weight to each.

[44] As mentioned earlier, the ‘reasons for the delay’ is a factor to be taken into account

in deciding whether there are exceptional circumstances. There is no statutory basis for

the adoption of a decision rule whereby if the applicant does not provide a credible

explanation for the entire period of the delay then the matter in s.366(2)(a) tells against

the finding of exceptional circumstances. Common sense would suggest otherwise, it is

plainly a question of degree and weight.

[45] What if the period of the delay was 30 days and the applicant had a credible

explanation for 29 of those days? It seems to us that such circumstances may weigh in

favour of a finding of exceptional circumstances. Of course, as mentioned earlier if there

was a credible explanation for the entirety of the delay that would weigh more heavily

in favour of such a finding. Conversely, if the applicant failed to provide a credible

explanation for any part of the delay that would tend to weigh against a finding of

exceptional circumstances.”

 

Extract from Campagnolo v My Skin Admin (Vic) Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 2893 delivered 9 November 2023 per Connolly C